Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021809›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-modal Language models in bioacoustics with zero-shot transfer: a case study.

Zhongqi Miao, Benjamin Elizalde, Soham Deshmukh, Justin Kitzes, Huaming Wang, Rahul Dodhia, Juan Lavista Ferres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhongqi MiaoAI for Good Lab, 1 Microsoft Way, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA. zhongqimiao@microsoft.com.
Benjamin ElizaldeMicrosoft, 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA.
Soham DeshmukhMicrosoft, 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA.
Justin KitzesDepartment of Biological Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Huaming WangMicrosoft, 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA.
Rahul DodhiaAI for Good Lab, 1 Microsoft Way, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA.
Juan Lavista FerresAI for Good Lab, 1 Microsoft Way, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, 98052, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatically detecting sound events with Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increas- ingly popular in the field of bioacoustics, ecoacoustics, and soundscape ecology, particularly for wildlife monitoring and conservation. Conventional methods predominantly employ supervised learning techniques that depend on substantial amounts of manually annotated bioacoustic data. However, manual annotation in bioacoustics is tremendously resource- intensive in terms of both human labor and financial resources, and it requires considerable domain expertise. Moreover, the supervised learning framework limits the application scope to predefined categories within a closed setting. The recent advent of Multi-Modal Language Models has markedly enhanced the versatility and possibilities within the realm of AI appli- cations, as this technique addresses many of the challenges that inhibit the deployment of AI in real-world applications. In this paper, we explore the potential of Multi-Modal Language Models in the context of bioacoustics through a case study. We aim to showcase the potential and limitations of Multi-Modal Language Models in bioacoustic applications. In our case study, we applied an Audio-Language Model--a type of Multi-Modal Language Model that aligns language with audio / sound recording data--named CLAP (Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining) to eight bioacoustic benchmarks covering a wide variety of sounds previously unfamiliar to the model. We demonstrate that CLAP, after simple prompt engineering, can effectively recognize group-level categories such as birds, frogs, and whales across the benchmarks without the need for specific model fine-tuning or additional training, achieving a zero-shot transfer recognition performance comparable to supervised learning baselines. Moreover, we show that CLAP has the potential to perform tasks previously unattainable with supervised bioacoustic approaches, such as estimating relative distances and discovering unknown animal species. On the other hand, we also identify limitations of CLAP, such as the model's inability to recognize fine-grained species-level categories and the reliance on manually engineered text prompts in real-world applications.

Indexed as

AcousticsArtificial IntelligenceLanguageAnimalsHumansArtificial IntelligenceAudio-Language modelsBioacousticsMulti-modal Language modelsWildlife conservationZero-shot transfer

Identifiers

PMID40021809
PMCPMC11871236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.