Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021803›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2025

The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Domestic Violence Against Pregnant Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kosar Miraei Mohammadi, Zohreh Shahhosseini, Mahtab Haji Mohammadreza, Fatemeh Heshmatnia, Roya Nikbakht, Erfan Ghasemi, Maryam Jafari, Hamed Milani, Marzieh Azizi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kosar Miraei MohammadiStudent Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-2277
Zohreh ShahhosseiniDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mahtab Haji MohammadrezaStudent Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Fatemeh HeshmatniaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
Roya NikbakhtDepartment of Biostatics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Erfan GhasemiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam JafariDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hamed MilaniFaculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Marzieh AziziDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-3201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDomestic violence (DV) against women has been reported increasingly, especially during the pandemic worldwide. Exposure to DV during pregnancy is associated with various maternal and neonatal adverse consequences. Therefore, the current study aims to systematically investigate and analyze the prevalence and associated factors of DV or intimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, systematic literature searches in electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Scientific Information Database, were conducted from December 2023 to May 2024. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional and cohort studies. All included studies were entered into a meta-analysis. The binomial distribution formula was used to calculate the variance of point prevalence. In addition, meta-regression was used to assess the prevalence of DV based on the sampling place and quality of the included studies. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata version 11.0, Texas, USA.

resultsOf 16 studies included, 156,775 pregnant women participated, and the sample sizes varied from 215 to 77,310 individuals. According to the combining the results of 12 studies, the overall prevalence of physical, psychological, and sexual violence against pregnant women during COVID-19 was estimated at 13.83 (95% CI, 5.92%-21.73%), 40.02% (95% CI, 22.74%-57.30%), and 15.09% (95% CI, 6.49%-23.69%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of the total IPV against pregnant women during COVID-19, according to the combined results of 15 studies, was estimated at 36.82% (95% CI, 22.24%-51.40%).

conclusionAlthough the prevalence of all types of violence against pregnant women increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other times, the results of the present study indicated that psychological violence was the most common violence reported by pregnant women. Therefore, it seems that identifying high-risk pregnant women as victims of violence is imperative to develop preventive interventions for this vulnerable group globally.

Indexed as

COVID-19Domestic ViolenceIntimate Partner ViolencePregnant PeopleFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2COVID‐19 | domestic violence | physical | pregnancy | psychological | sexual

Identifiers

PMID40021803
PMCPMC11870823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.