SynthesisEye (London, England)2025
The impact of extended reality simulators on ophthalmic surgical training and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17,623 eyes.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of extended reality (XR) simulation on ophthalmology training outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- From pen to prompt: does digital medicine matter for the hands of the future microsurgeon?Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Teaching ophthalmic microsurgical skills: conventional microscopy versus heads-up visualization.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Virtual Reality in Ophthalmic Surgical Education: Current Innovations and Future Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtended reality (XR) simulators, including virtual reality and augmented reality, hold significant promise for enhancing surgical training by providing trainees with a controlled practice environment. This is particularly vital in microsurgery, where the steep learning curve and the challenge of mastering surgical skills are significant. Despite notable advancements in XR technology, its role in ophthalmic surgical training remains uncertain.
methodsIn our systematic review and meta-analysis, eight electronic databases were searched, and studies were evaluated against predefined criteria. Data extraction and random-effects meta-analysis assessed the odds ratio (OR) for posterior capsular rupture (PCR), an important surgical complication.
resultsA meta-analysis of 17,623 eyes that underwent cataract surgery across seven studies revealed a significant decrease in PCR post-Eyesi practice, with low heterogeneity across studies (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.60-0.85, I
conclusionsXR simulators enhance ophthalmic surgical training by reducing complications like PCR, and improving surgical performance, self-efficacy, and non-dominant hand dexterity. These findings challenge conventional training methods and advocate for integrating XR into residency curricula to optimize learning and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.