Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021761›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Comparative analysis using a chromosome-scale genome assembly for Funaria hygrometrica suggests greater collinearity in mosses than in seed plants.

Alexander Kirbis, Nasim Rahmatpour, Shanshan Dong, Jin Yu, Lucas Waser, Huaxing Huang, Nico van Gessel, Manuel Waller, Ralf Reski, Daniel Lang and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Importance of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alexander KirbisDepartment of Systematic and Evoutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-3103
Nasim RahmatpourDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Shanshan DongKey Laboratory of Southern Subtropical Plant Diversity, Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jin YuKey Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Lucas WaserDepartment of Systematic and Evoutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Huaxing HuangDepartment of Systematic and Evoutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nico van GesselPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-246X
Manuel WallerDepartment of Systematic and Evoutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ralf ReskiPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, and Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-6711
Daniel LangBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Microbial Genomics and Bioforensics, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-0716
Stefan A RensingPlant Cell Biology, Department of Biology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-873X
Eva M TemschDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jill L WegrzynDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Bernard GoffinetDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Yang LiuKey Laboratory of Southern Subtropical Plant Diversity, Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-839X
Péter SzövényiDepartment of Systematic and Evoutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. peter.szoevenyi@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-4639

Funding

NCHHSTP CDC HHS U65 PS001111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosses, the largest lineage of seed-free plants, have smaller and less variable genome sizes than flowering plants. Nevertheless, whether this difference results from divergent genome dynamics is poorly known. Here, we use newly generated chromosome-scale genome assemblies for Funaria hygrometrica and comparative analysis with other moss and seed plant genomes to investigate moss genome dynamics. Although some aspects of moss genome dynamics are seed plant-like, such as the mechanism of genome size change and de novo gain/loss of genes, moss genomes retain higher synteny, and collinearity over evolutionary time than seed plant genomes. Furthermore, transposable elements and genes are more evenly distributed along chromosomes in mosses than in seed plants, a feature shared with other sequenced seed-free plant genomes. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that large-scale genome structure and dynamics of mosses and seed plants differ. In particular, our data suggest a lower rate of gene order reshuffling along chromosomes in mosses compared to seed plants. We speculate that such lower rate of structural genomic variation and unique chromosome structure in mosses may contribute to their relatively smaller and less variable genome sizes.

Indexed as

BryopsidaChromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantSeedsDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularSyntenyDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID40021761
PMCPMC11871058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.