ArticleCommunications biology2025
Comparative analysis using a chromosome-scale genome assembly for Funaria hygrometrica suggests greater collinearity in mosses than in seed plants.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Insights Into the Probiotic and Safety Attributes of Pediococcus acidilactici BC-7 for its Potential Application in Livestock Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Helitrons are enriched in lichenized fungi with long generation lengths and small distribution sizes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Multiplication of peat moss (Sphagnum L.) species for climate action.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- The Importance of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genome-wide identification of the UMAMIT gene family in Medicago sativa L. and analysis of the response of umamits mutant to abiotic stress.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Functional characterisation of Target of Rapamycin (TOR) signalling in Physcomitrella.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 targeted genetic screening in Physcomitrella identifies novel cell division genes.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mosses, the largest lineage of seed-free plants, have smaller and less variable genome sizes than flowering plants. Nevertheless, whether this difference results from divergent genome dynamics is poorly known. Here, we use newly generated chromosome-scale genome assemblies for Funaria hygrometrica and comparative analysis with other moss and seed plant genomes to investigate moss genome dynamics. Although some aspects of moss genome dynamics are seed plant-like, such as the mechanism of genome size change and de novo gain/loss of genes, moss genomes retain higher synteny, and collinearity over evolutionary time than seed plant genomes. Furthermore, transposable elements and genes are more evenly distributed along chromosomes in mosses than in seed plants, a feature shared with other sequenced seed-free plant genomes. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that large-scale genome structure and dynamics of mosses and seed plants differ. In particular, our data suggest a lower rate of gene order reshuffling along chromosomes in mosses compared to seed plants. We speculate that such lower rate of structural genomic variation and unique chromosome structure in mosses may contribute to their relatively smaller and less variable genome sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.