ArticleScientific reports2025
An accurate DNA and RNA based targeted sequencing assay for clinical detection of gene fusions in solid tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene fusions are one of the most important molecular biomarkers for tumor diagnosis, classification and targeted therapy. How to accurately detect them is a key issue in clinical work. In this study, a custom-designed integration of DNA and RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS) assay including 16 targeted therapy related genes was developed and validated to identify gene fusions in solid tumors. This assay accurately identified all 10 different types of fusion in 8 commercial fusion spiked-in reference standards and 29 fusions including 16 different fusion forms in 60 clinical solid tumor samples previously identified by clinical testing methods. In addition, a TPM3::NTRK1 fusion was additionally identified and validated by Sanger sequencing, which showed a false-negative result for the previous result. Mutational abundance limit of detection for the assay was assessed with a series of dilution experiments. These fusions can be stably detected when the mutational abundance is down to 5% for DNA and 250-400 copies/100 ng for RNA. The intra-assay and inter-assay reproducibility was observed in three samples and three replicates. This integration of DNA and RNA-based NGS assay shows excellent performance on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, results at different levels can complement each other, thereby facilitating precise diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.