ArticleScientific reports2025
Acute and chronic gene expression activation following medial forebrain bundle DBS and selective dopamine pathway stimulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep brain stimulation of medial forebrain bundle modulates noradrenergic activity and feedforward inhibition in rodent model of depression.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the medial forebrain bundle (mfb) demonstrated anti-depressant effects both clinically and experimentally. Modulation of mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic (DA) activity could contribute-in part-to the therapeutic effects. By comparing selective and pathway specific midbrain DA optogenetic stimulation with the global, non-pathway specific mfb-DBS, the study explored changes in gene-expression of key biomarkers associated with neurocircuitry of depression. Rats received either optogenetic DAergic or mfb-DBS, delivered as acute/single or chronic/repeated stimulation. Micro-dissected regions were prepared for in situ hybridization targeting biomarkers of GABAergic, glutamatergic, and dopaminergic systems. Mfb-DBS mediated DA independent pathway increased GABAergic biomarkers (GABAA, GAD1) in frontal and accumbal regions, not in midbrain. The combinations of low frequency/high pulse width and high frequency/low pulse width stimulation generally increased biomarker expression similarly, but chronic/repetitive stimulation had no accumulative effect. Interestingly, unilateral stimulation had bilateral effects, but stimulation modalities had little impact on DAT and Vglut2 expression. In conclusion, both low and high frequency, acute/single and chronic/repetitive mfb-DBS-but not selective optogenetic stimulation -activated gene expression of biomarkers associated with GABAergic transmission. The increased expression was transitory and less chronic than predicted. Importantly, the study provides evidence that the anti-depressant therapeutic effects of clinical medial forebrain bundle DBS occurs-in part-be via modulation of GABAergic signalling which in turn could regulate the release of dopamine in frontal and accumbal regions. In addition, clinical implication of the data is that unilateral stimulation had bilateral consequences on the gene expression, although the physiological and functional sequelae of this are yet unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.