ArticleScientific reports2025
Physics-informed modeling of splitting tensile strength of recycled aggregate concrete using advanced machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Intelligent Condition-Monitoring Framework for Alkaline Water Electrolyzers Based on Hybrid Physics-Informed Health Indicators.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sustainable Concrete with Waste Tire Rubber and Recycled Steel Fibers: Experimental Insights and Hybrid PINN-CatBoost Prediction.Polymers · 2025Article
- Developing machine learning frameworks to predict mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete mixed with various industrial byproducts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-driven models for prediction of ceramic tiles' properties and detection of the influences: Behavior during shaping and drying.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physics-informed modeling (PIM) using advanced machine learning (ML) represents a paradigm shift in the field of concrete technology, offering a potent blend of scientific rigor and computational efficiency. By harnessing the synergies between physics-based principles and data-driven algorithms, PIM-ML not only streamlines the design process but also enhances the reliability and sustainability of concrete structures. As research continues to refine these models and validate their performance, their adoption promises to revolutionize how concrete materials are engineered, tested, and utilized in construction projects worldwide. In this research work, an extensive literature review, which produced a global representative database for the splitting tensile strength (Fsp) of recycled aggregate concrete, was indulged. The studied concrete components such as C, W, NCAg, PL, RCAg_D, RCAg_P, RCAg_wa, Vf, and F_type were measured and tabulated. The collected 257 records were partitioned into training set of 200 records (80%) and validation set of 57 records (20%) in line with a more reliable partitioning of database. Five advanced machine learning techniques created using the "Weka Data Mining" software version 3.8.6 were applied to predict the Fsp and the Hoffman & Gardener method and performance metrics were also used to evaluate the sensitivity and performance of the variables and ML models, respectively. The results show the Kstar model demonstrates the highest level of performance and reliability among the models, achieving exceptional accuracy with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.