Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021733›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Physics-informed modeling of splitting tensile strength of recycled aggregate concrete using advanced machine learning.

Kennedy C Onyelowe, Viroon Kamchoom, Shadi Hanandeh, S Anandha Kumar, Rolando Fabián Zabala Vizuete, Rodney Orlando Santillán Murillo, Susana Monserrat Zurita Polo, Rolando Marcel Torres Castillo, Ahmed M Ebid, Paul Awoyera and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kennedy C OnyeloweDepartment of Civil Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria. kennedychibuzor@kiu.ac.ug.
Viroon KamchoomExcellent Center for Green and Sustainable Infrastructure, Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Bangkok, 10520, Thailand. viroon.ka@kmitl.ac.th.
Shadi HanandehDepartment of Civil Engineering, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan.
S Anandha KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aditya University, Surampalem, 533437, India.
Rolando Fabián Zabala VizueteFacultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Panamericana Sur km 1½, 060155, Riobamba, Ecuador.
Rodney Orlando Santillán MurilloFacultad de Administracion de Empresas, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Panamericana Sur km 1½, 060155, Riobamba, Ecuador.
Susana Monserrat Zurita PoloFacultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Panamericana Sur km 1½, 060155, Riobamba, Ecuador.
Rolando Marcel Torres CastilloEscuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Sede Orellana, 220001, El Coca, Ecuador.
Ahmed M EbidDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.abdelkhaleq@fue.edu.eg.
Paul AwoyeraDepartment of Civil Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, 34754, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Krishna Prakash ArunachalamDepartamento de Ciencias de la Construcción, Facultad de Ciencias de la Construcción Ordenamiento Territorial, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile. k.prakash@utem.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-informed modeling (PIM) using advanced machine learning (ML) represents a paradigm shift in the field of concrete technology, offering a potent blend of scientific rigor and computational efficiency. By harnessing the synergies between physics-based principles and data-driven algorithms, PIM-ML not only streamlines the design process but also enhances the reliability and sustainability of concrete structures. As research continues to refine these models and validate their performance, their adoption promises to revolutionize how concrete materials are engineered, tested, and utilized in construction projects worldwide. In this research work, an extensive literature review, which produced a global representative database for the splitting tensile strength (Fsp) of recycled aggregate concrete, was indulged. The studied concrete components such as C, W, NCAg, PL, RCAg_D, RCAg_P, RCAg_wa, Vf, and F_type were measured and tabulated. The collected 257 records were partitioned into training set of 200 records (80%) and validation set of 57 records (20%) in line with a more reliable partitioning of database. Five advanced machine learning techniques created using the "Weka Data Mining" software version 3.8.6 were applied to predict the Fsp and the Hoffman & Gardener method and performance metrics were also used to evaluate the sensitivity and performance of the variables and ML models, respectively. The results show the Kstar model demonstrates the highest level of performance and reliability among the models, achieving exceptional accuracy with an R

Indexed as

Concrete structuresPhysics-informed modelingRecycled aggregate concreteSplitting tensile strengthSustainable construction

Identifiers

PMID40021733
PMCPMC11871005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.