Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021731›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Skin cancer detection using dermoscopic images with convolutional neural network.

Khadija Nawaz, Atika Zanib, Iqra Shabir, Jianqiang Li, Yu Wang, Tariq Mahmood, Amjad Rehman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Foundation Models Meet Medical Image Interpretation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khadija NawazFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Atika ZanibDepartment of Computer Science, University of Education, Vehari Campus, Vehari, 61161, Pakistan.
Iqra ShabirDepartment of Computer Science, University of Education, Vehari Campus, Vehari, 61161, Pakistan.
Jianqiang LiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Yu WangShandong Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Shandong, China.
Tariq MahmoodArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) Lab, CCIS, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia. tmsherazi@ue.edu.pk.
Amjad RehmanArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) Lab, CCIS, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Jianqiang Li This study is supported by the National Key RD Program of China with project no. 2020YFB2104402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin malignant melanoma is a high-risk tumor with low incidence but high mortality rates. Early detection and treatment are crucial for a cure. Machine learning studies have focused on classifying melanoma tumors, but these methods are cumbersome and fail to extract deeper features. This limits their ability to distinguish subtle variations in skin lesions accurately, hindering effective early diagnosis. The study introduces a deep learning-based network specifically designed for skin lesion detection to enhance data in the melanoma dataset. It leverages a novel FCDS-CNN architecture to address class-imbalanced problems and improve data quality. Specifically, FCDS-CNN incorporates data augmentation and class weighting techniques to mitigate the impact of imbalanced classes. It also presents a practical, large-scale solution that allows seamless, real-world incorporation to support dermatologists in their early screening processes. The proposed robust model incorporates data augmentation and class weighting to improve performance across all lesions. The proposed dataset includes 10015 images of seven classes of skin lesions available in Kaggle. To overcome the dominance of one class over the other, methods like data augmentation and class weighting are used. The FCDS-CNN showed improved accuracy with an average accuracy of 96%, outperforming pre-trained models such as ResNet, EfficientNet, Inception, and MobileNet in the precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve parameters. These pre-trained models are more effective for general image classification and struggle with the nuanced features and class imbalances inherent in medical image datasets. The FCDS-CNN demonstrated practical effectiveness by outperforming the compared pre-trained model based on distinct parameters. This work is a testament to the importance of specificity in medical image analysis regarding skin cancer detection.

Indexed as

DermoscopyMelanomaNeural Networks, ComputerSkin NeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDeep LearningEarly Detection of CancerHumans

Identifiers

PMID40021731
PMCPMC11871080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.