ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced object detection in remote sensing images by applying metaheuristic and hybrid metaheuristic optimizers to YOLOv7 and YOLOv8.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution bias embedding tuning of vision transformer for remote sensing object detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing RetinaNet anchors using differential evolution for improved object detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing hyperparameters of YOLOv10 for arson detection using advanced optimization algorithms.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developments in object detection algorithms are critical for urban planning, environmental monitoring, surveillance, and many other applications. The primary objective of the article was to improve detection precision and model efficiency. The paper compared the performance of six different metaheuristic optimization algorithms including Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Remora Optimization Algorithm (ROA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), and Hybrid PSO-GWO (HPSGWO) combined with YOLOv7 and YOLOv8. The study included two distinct remote sensing datasets, RSOD and VHR-10. Many performance measures as precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) were used during the training, validation, and testing processes, as well as the fit score. The results show significant improvements in both YOLO variants following optimization using these strategies. The GWO-optimized YOLOv7 with 0.96 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95, and the HPSGWO-optimized YOLOv8 with 0.97 mAP 50, and 0.72 mAP 50:95 had the best performance in the RSOD dataset. Similarly, the GWO-optimized versions of YOLOv7 and YOLOv8 had the best performance on the VHR-10 dataset with 0.87 mAP 50, and 0.58 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv7 and with 0.99 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv8, indicating greater performance. The findings supported the usefulness of metaheuristic optimization in increasing the precision and recall rates of YOLO algorithms and demonstrated major significance in improving object recognition tasks in remote sensing imaging, opening up a viable route for applications in a variety of disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.