Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021647›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Structural basis of error-prone DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase θ.

Chuxuan Li, Leora M Maksoud, Yang Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chuxuan LiDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., Houston, 77005, TX, USA.
Leora M MaksoudDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., Houston, 77005, TX, USA.
Yang GaoDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., Houston, 77005, TX, USA. yg60@rice.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-0431

Funding

American Cancer Society (American Cancer Society, Inc.) RSG-22-082-01-DMCCancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas) RR190046Welch Foundation C-2033-20200401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA polymerase θ (Pol θ) is an A-family DNA polymerase specialized in DNA double-strand breaks repair and translesion synthesis. Distinct from its high-fidelity homologs in DNA replication, Pol θ catalyzes template-dependent DNA synthesis with an inherent propensity for error incorporation. However, the structural basis of Pol θ's low-fidelity DNA synthesis is not clear. Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures detailing the polymerase domain of human Pol θ in complex with a cognate C:G base pair (bp), a mismatched T:G bp, or a mismatched T:T bp. Our structures illustrate that Pol θ snugly accommodates the mismatched nascent base pairs within its active site with the finger domain well-closed, consistent with our in-solution fluorescence measurement but in contrast to its high-fidelity homologs. In addition, structural examination and mutagenesis study show that unique residues surrounding the active site contribute to the stabilization of the mismatched nascent base pair. Furthermore, Pol θ can efficiently extend from the misincorporated T:G or T:T mismatches, yet with a preference for template or primer looping-out, resulting in insertions and deletions. Collectively, our results elucidate how an A-family polymerase is adapted for error-prone DNA synthesis.

Indexed as

DNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA ReplicationBase PairingBase Pair MismatchCatalytic DomainCryoelectron MicroscopyDNA Polymerase thetaHumansModels, MolecularDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase theta

Identifiers

PMID40021647
PMCPMC11871136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.