ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025
Development and multi-center cross-setting validation of an explainable prediction model for sarcopenic obesity: a machine learning approach based on readily available clinical features.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From explainability to clinical actionability: translating artificial intelligence models into decision support for endocrine disease management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a scoping review of prevalence, assessment tools, associated factors, and interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An interpretable nomogram with SHAP analysis predicts thrombotic failure of forearm arteriovenous fistulas.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Advancing Precision Diagnosis of Sarcopenic Obesity Through Digital Technologies, Wearables and Omics Data.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of a sarcopenic obesity risk prediction model for older adults based on the CHARLS database.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Exploring Sarcopenic Obesity in the Cancer Setting: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on Prognosis and Predictors Using Machine Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Methodological Review of Classification Trees for Risk Stratification: An Application Example in the Obesity Paradox.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in personalized nutrition and food manufacturing: a comprehensive review of methods, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Prediction of obesity levels based on physical activity and eating habits with a machine learning model integrated with explainable artificial intelligence.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSarcopenic obesity (SO), characterized by the coexistence of obesity and sarcopenia, is an increasingly prevalent condition in aging populations, associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. We aimed to identify and validate an explainable prediction model of SO using easily available clinical characteristics. SETTING AND
participantsA preliminary cohort of 1,431 participants from three community regions in Ziyang city, China, was used for model development and internal validation. For external validation, we utilized data from 832 residents of multi-center nursing homes. MEASUREMENTS: The diagnosis of SO was based on the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) criteria. Five machine learning models (support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, light gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting) were used to predict SO. The performance of these models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used for model interpretation.
resultsAfter feature reduction, an 8-feature model demonstrated good predictive ability. Among the five models tested, the support vector machine (SVM) model performed best in SO prediction in both internal (AUC = 0.862) and external (AUC = 0.785) validation sets. The eight key predictors identified were BMI, gender, neck circumference, waist circumference, thigh circumference, time to full tandem standing, time to five-times sit-to-stand, and age. SHAP analysis revealed BMI and gender as the most influential predictors. To facilitate the utilization of the SVM model in clinical setting, we developed a web application ( https://svcpredictapp.streamlit.app/ ).
conclusionsWe developed an explainable machine learning model to predict SO in aging community and nursing populations. This model offers a novel, accessible, and interpretable approach to SO prediction with potential to enhance early detection and intervention strategies. Further studies are warranted to validate our model in diverse populations and evaluate its impact on patient outcomes when integrated into comprehensive geriatric assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.