ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Population Pharmacokinetics of IV Lidocaine and its Metabolites in Adult Surgical Patients.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07552766 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of the Impact of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Total Opioid Requirements in Children Undergoing Surgical Fixation of Upper Extremity Long Bone Fractures Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of the Impact of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Total Opioid Requirements in Children Undergoing Surgical Fixation of Upper Extremity Long Bone Fractures Under General Anesthesia
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Effects of Anaesthetic Compounds on a Panel of Solid Tumour Cell Lines-An Exploratory Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an HPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantitative Bioanalysis of Lidocaine and its Metabolites in Human Plasma: Application in a Population Pharmacokinetic Study.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative lidocaine infusions show potential as a systemic analgesic and to enhance postoperative recovery. This study characterised the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lidocaine and its metabolites, monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX), in adult surgical patients using non-linear mixed-effects modelling.
methodsThirty-four donor nephrectomy and 64 cholecystectomy patients received intraoperative IV lidocaine. Plasma samples were collected perioperatively and analysed in NONMEM. Covariate effects and alternative dosing regimens were investigated.
results1,520 concentration-timepoints were analysed. Lidocaine PK was best fitted with a 3-compartment model, while MEGX and GX used a 2-compartment model. All parameters were scaled allometrically with total body mass and fat-free mass (FFM). Lidocaine had a typical clearance of 45.9 L/h, decreasing by 60% postoperatively, and a central volume of 25.2 L. Peripheral compartments 1 and 2 exhibited intercompartmental clearances of 142 L/h and 5.81 L/h, with volumes of 44.4 L and 29.3 L, respectively. Peripheral compartment 1's volume expanded with intraoperative fluid administration. Simulations suggested an FFM-based dosing regimen (bolus: 2.5 mg/kg over 30 min, single infusion: 2 mg/kg over 1 h, maintenance infusion: 1.5 mg/kg/h) quickly achieved and maintained a lidocaine target plasma concentration of 1.5 mg/L.
conclusionsThe joint parent-metabolites model adequately describes the disposition of lidocaine and its metabolites, incorporating allometric scaling and key covariates. It provides a foundation for optimising lidocaine dosing and guiding investigations to establish target plasma concentrations for safe and effective use in the general surgical population. Further research is warranted to refine and evaluate the model's utility in other surgical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40021547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.