ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Role and perception of healthcare professionals in referring cancer patients to online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to Better Manage Insomnia in French Cancer Patients With a Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy? The Sleep-4-All 2.0 Real World Multicenter Single-Arm Interventional Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Trial
- Exploring the Experiences of Cancer Patients Following an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia With Professional Phone Guidance: The Sleep-4-All-2.0 Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Implementing a digital treatment program for patients with irritable bowel syndrome into routine care: a qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators perceived by key stakeholders.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInsomnia represents a major issue in oncology, which can be successfully treated by online Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia, such as the Insomnet program. However, promoting its successful implementation in routine care requires healthcare providers' involvement. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of this online program.
methodsThis qualitative study was a part of the French Sleep-4-All-2.0 multicentric study. It explored, through two focus groups including 19 healthcare professionals of three cancer centers, their perceptions regarding their role in patient referral, and the perceived barriers and facilitators in accessing this type of intervention. The content of the focus groups was subjected to a descriptive thematic analysis.
resultsFour major themes were identified: (1) ambivalent representations of online tools (including patients convinced by remote intervention, evolution of representations in relation to the health context, adapted to sleep disorders, professionals' preconceptions of online tools), (2) barriers to implementation (including few perceived barriers, forgetting patients' particularities, professionals' lack of knowledge, a possible threat to the patient-caregiver relationship, financial cost), (3) levers for implementation (including real benefits for patients, professionals who feel confident, preserved patient-caregiver relationship, institutional innovations to remedy dysfunctions), and (4) professional involvement in implementation (what they need, what to avoid, what they already do, what they see themselves doing).
conclusionOnline (healthcare) services were reported to help increase access to healthcare, but that should not replace the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. All professionals must be informed and trained to refer patients to these programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40021529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.