ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Improvement of perceived cochlear implant sound quality through individualized psychoacoustic-based frequency fitting.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn recent years, there has been a trend toward more individualization in the fitting of cochlear implants (CI). Here, a new individualized approach to frequency band allocation was used. This approach is based on binaural perceptual pitch matching. PATIENT: The patient had congenital bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss due to Usher Syndrome. He had used hearing aids in both ears since the age of 4 years. In his mid-40s, he received a CI on his right ear and, ten months later, a second CI on the left ear.
interventionAdjustments to the frequency band allocations were made, guided by the binaural perceptual pitch matching of piano notes. For the first CI, pitch matching was performed using the contralateral ear as the reference, which had preserved low-frequency residual hearing (bimodal pitch matching). For the second CI, pitch matching was performed using the first implanted side as the reference (bilateral electrical pitch matching).
resultsThe final frequency band allocation adjustments were always shifted toward lower frequencies relative to the default band allocations. The adjustments were larger in magnitude for the second CI compared to the first CI. Speech perception scores generally increased over the course of rehabilitation and were higher with the individualized fitting compared to the default fitting. The subjective sound quality was reportedly greatly improved with the individualized fitting.
conclusionsIndividualized psychoacoustic frequency-based fitting can yield improvements in the perceived sound quality with a CI. However, this method requires significant residual hearing in at least one ear, and the patient must have relatively fine pitch discrimination abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.