ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2025
Estimating Pressed and Breathy Phonation From Cepstral and Spectral Measures.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direction of Cepstral Peak Prominence Change Moderates Divergent Kinematic Responses to Voice Stimulability Testing.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
- Vocal Fold Vibratory Kinematics and Acoustic Correlates in Pressed and Breathy Phonation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Voice Outcomes of Clear Speech Cueing in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- The Pediatric Vocal Mechanism: Structure and Function.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to determine (1) how cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and the amplitude difference between the first two spectral harmonics (H
methodAcoustic voice recordings were obtained from 50 vocally healthy individuals. Speech tasks included five repetitions of three sustained vowels (/ɑ, i, u/) and one all-voiced sentence ("We were away a year ago") using three voice production conditions (typical, breathy, and pressed). For each production, we calculated average smoothed CPP and H
resultsIn connected speech, pressed phonation demonstrated higher CPP and lower H
conclusionCPP and H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.