Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021419›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025

The epidemiology, pathology and pathogenesis of MS: Therapeutic implications.

Douglas S Goodin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiple sclerosis: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Special Edition: Therapeutic advances in multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Douglas S GoodinUniversity of California, San Francisco and the San Francisco VA Medical Center, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite #221D, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: douglas.goodin@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, and potentially disabling, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS is generally characterized by recurrent, and self-limited, episodes of neurological dysfunction, which occur unpredictably and often result in multifocal tissue injury within the CNS. Currently, women are affected two to three times as often as men although this may not have been the case during earlier Time-Periods. The pathogenesis of MS is known to involve both critical genetic and environmental mechanisms. Nevertheless, in addition to these two mechanisms, disease-pathogenesis also involves a "truly" random event. Indeed, it is this random mechanism, which is responsible for the currently-observed (and increasing) excess of women among patients with MS. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of MS (includong its epidemiology, pathology, and genetics) and considers the therapeutic implications that these pathogenetic mechanisms have both for our currently available therapies as well as for the possible therapeutic approaches to the management of this potentially disabling condition in the future.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisFemaleHumansMaleGeneticsMultiple sclerosis epidemiologyPathogenesisPathologyTherapy

Identifiers

PMID40021419
PMCPMC12418443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.