ArticleNeuropsychologia2025
Somatosensory influence on auditory cortical response of self-generated sound.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor execution which results in the generation of sounds attenuates the cortical response to these self-generated sounds. This attenuation has been explained as a result of motor relevant processing. The current study shows that corresponding somatosensory inputs can also change the auditory processing of a self-generated sound. We recorded auditory event-related potentials (ERP) in response to self-generated sounds and assessed how the amount of auditory attenuation changed according to the somatosensory inputs. The sound stimuli were generated by a finger movement that pressed on a virtual object, which was produced by a haptic robotic device. Somatosensory inputs were modulated by changing the stiffness of this virtual object (low and high) in an unpredictable manner. For comparison purposes, we carried out the same test with a computer keyboard, which is conventionally used to induce the auditory attenuation of self-generated sound. While N1 and P2 attenuations were clearly induced in the control condition with the keyboard as has been observed in previous studies, when using the robotic device the amplitude of N1 was found to vary according to the stiffness of the virtual object. The amplitude of N1 in the low stiffness condition was similar to that found using the keyboard for the same condition but not in the high stiffness condition. In addition, P2 attenuation did not differ between stiffness conditions. The waveforms of auditory ERP after 200 ms also differed according to the stiffness conditions. The estimated source of N1 attenuation was located in the right parietal area. These results suggest that somatosensory inputs during movement can modify the auditory processing of self-generated sound. The auditory processing of self-generated sound may represent self-referenced processing like an embodied process or an action-perception mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.