Trial reportSchizophrenia research2025
Effects of visual remediation on Ebbinghaus illusion task performance in people with schizophrenia: A preliminary study.
Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtypical perception of visual illusions is well-documented in schizophrenia (SZ) and thought to be a consequence of impairments in visual processes including perceptual organization (PO). The Ebbinghaus illusion, in which a circle appears larger or smaller depending on the size of surrounding circles, is facilitated by PO, and the extent to which the surrounds (i.e., context) influence perception of the center circle can be considered an index of context sensitivity. In the present study, as part of a broader investigation of the impact of a novel visual remediation (VR) program for people with SZ, the Ebbinghaus illusion was used to explore the effects of VR on context sensitivity.
methodsParticipants with SZ (n = 47) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: VR only, an active control condition (AC), or one of two conditions combining VR and AC. At three assessment points, participants completed a size comparison task based on the Ebbinghaus illusion. Context sensitivity was compared between training groups and with baseline clinical characteristics.
resultsAt baseline, participants were strongly context sensitive. After training, participants in the VR group, but not the AC-only group, became less influenced by context. The main effect of training group and the group × time interaction terms were not significant. Participants who were less symptomatic at baseline showed the greatest reductions in context sensitivity over time.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that an adaptive reduction in the influence of irrelevant context is a potential effect of VR and may reflect improved attentional focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.