Observational studyMedicine2025
Epidemiology of lateral and medial epicondylitis in South Korea: A nationwide population-based study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual pathology in lateral elbow pain: the overlooked role of posterior interosseous nerve compression in refractory lateral epicondylitis.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have reported the epidemiology of lateral epicondylitis (LE) and medial epicondylitis (ME) in nationwide databases. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of LE and ME in South Korea. We analyzed data from the nationwide database of the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2013 to 2017. We investigated the incidence, prevalence, and surgical trends in patients with LE or ME. Between 2013 and 2017, we identified 2813,431 and 836,610 patients with LE and ME, respectively. LE and ME were more frequently diagnosed in women than in men. During the study period, the mean annual age-adjusted incidence rates of LE and ME were 9.7 per 1000 people and 2.9 per 1000 people, respectively. The incidence of LE did not change significantly during the study period, but the prevalence rate increased significantly. Conversely, the incidence and prevalence rates of ME have significantly increased. Furthermore, 0.8% and 1.0% of patients with LE and ME, respectively, required surgical treatment, showing an annual increase in the number of surgical treatments for LE and ME, respectively. The proportion of arthroscopic surgeries performed for LE did not significantly change during the study period. The prevalence of LE and ME has increased in South Korea. Consequently, the number of surgeries performed annually for LE and ME has increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.