ReviewJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Recent Use of Novel Data Streams During Foodborne Illness Cluster Investigations by the United States Food and Drug Administration: Qualitative Review.
Review in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foodborne illness outbreaks attributed to chemical hazards in the United States, 2011-2025.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Foodborne illness is a continuous public health risk. The recognition of signals indicating a cluster of foodborne illness is key to the detection, mitigation, and prevention of foodborne adverse event incidents and outbreaks. With increased internet availability and access, novel data streams (NDSs) for foodborne illness reports initiated by users outside of the traditional public health framework have emerged. These include, but are not limited to, social media websites, web-based product reviews posted to retailer websites, and private companies that host public-generated notices of foodborne illnesses. Information gathered by these platforms can help identify early signals of foodborne illness clusters or help inform ongoing public health investigations. Here we present an overview of NDSs and 3 investigations of foodborne illness incidents by the US Food and Drug Administration that included the use of NDSs at various stages. Each example demonstrates how these data were collected, integrated into traditional data sources, and used to inform the investigation. NDSs present a unique opportunity for public health agencies to identify clusters that may not have been identified otherwise, due to new or unique etiologies, as shown in the 3 examples. Clusters may also be identified earlier than they would have been through traditional sources. NDSs can further provide investigators supplemental information that may help confirm or rule out a source of illness. However, data collected from NDSs are often incomplete and lack critical details for investigators, such as product information (eg, lot numbers), clinical or medical details (eg, laboratory results of affected individuals), and contact information for report follow-up. In the future, public health agencies may wish to standardize an approach to maximize the potential of NDSs to catalyze and supplement adverse event investigations. Additionally, the collection of essential data elements by NDS platforms and data-sharing processes with public health agencies may aid in the investigation of foodborne illness clusters and inform subsequent public health and regulatory actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.