Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019921›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

"It's a mother's choice": Exploring personal experiences, community support, cultural influences, and breastfeeding alternatives in Florence, Italy.

Megan Morley, Anjali Natarajan, Nicole A Stepp, Andrea L DeMaria

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan MorleyDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8002-3705
Anjali NatarajanSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Nicole A SteppSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2725-1140
Andrea L DeMariaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the complex interplay of personal attitudes, community dynamics, and societal influences on breastfeeding experiences among women in Florence, Italy. Twenty-four women, aged 25 to 62, participated in comprehensive, 60-minute, in-person interviews conducted in May and June 2023. Four central themes emerged: 1) personal experiences, opinions, and attitudes, 2) communities involved in breastfeeding, 3) public opinion and culture, and 4) breastfeeding alternatives. Participants shared both emotional challenges and benefits, such as bonding and health advantages, while navigating the practical and social complexities of breastfeeding. Community support, including input from healthcare providers, midwives, and family networks, was crucial but varied in quality, sometimes offering encouragement and at other times presenting challenges. The findings highlight the individualized nature of breastfeeding durations, shaped by each mother's unique motivations and societal expectations. This study emphasizes the need for tailored support, public education, and comprehensive resources to foster positive breastfeeding experiences. The research advocates for policy and programmatic efforts that recognize and respect the diverse needs of mothers, promoting a supportive environment amid cultural and societal pressures.

Identifiers

PMID40019921
PMCPMC11870355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.