Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019913›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Prognosis of extracolonic findings on clinical computed tomographic colonography: A single-center experience.

Hideto Tomimatsu, Keita Fujimoto, Taketo Suto, Masayuki Matsuo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hideto TomimatsuRadiology Department, Japanese Red Cross Gifu Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5856-0794
Keita FujimotoRadiology Department, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan.
Taketo SutoRadiology Department, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-5983-1089
Masayuki MatsuoRadiology Department, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is crucial for colorectal cancer screening and secondary examinations, often revealing extracolonic findings with unclear significance. This study retrospectively evaluated the impact of such findings on the prognosis and management of 103 patients (mean observation period [OP]: 2183 days), categorized according to the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). The distributions were 17% (mean OP: 2,821 days) for E1, 38% for E2 (2,759 days), 6% for E3 (2,150 days), and 39% for E4 (1,338 days). Eighteen patients were further examined, but no treatment-related changes were observed in the E2 or E3 cases. Six of nine E4 patients responded to treatment (mean OP: 1,286 days). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worse prognosis for E4 (mean survival: 10.1 years) than for E1-E3 combined (5.6 years) (p < 0.0001). E4 findings are key in guiding treatment. The concordance rate between the clinical (Past E) and revised (Revised E) categories was high (0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.88). The prognoses differed significantly between Revised E1-E3 (mean survival: 10.0 years) and Revised E4 (6.2 years) (p < 0.0001). Although E4 significantly affects prognosis, E2 and E3 had limited effects on treatment, highlighting the need for further study to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40019913
PMCPMC11870342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.