ArticlePloS one2025
Nanoencapsulation of amitriptyline enhances the potency of antidepressant-like effects and exhibits anxiolytic-like effects in Wistar rats.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanocarriers in psychiatry: a comprehensive review of emerging frontiers in the management of psychiatric disorders.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Hirudin as a Therapeutic and Brain-Delivery Platform: From Stroke to Central Nervous System Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine for Depression: From Blood-Brain Barrier Delivery to Neuroimmune-Barrier-Plasticity Network Reprogramming.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Heterogeneous biological graph convolutional network for drug-target interaction prediction.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression poses a significant global health challenge, affecting an estimated 300 million people worldwide. While amitriptyline (Ami) remains one of the most effective antidepressants, its numerous side-effects contribute to a high dropout rate among patients. Addressing this issue requires exploring methods to enhance its bioavailability and reduce dosage. In this study, we describe a technique for producing amitriptyline nanoparticles (Ami-NPs) to improve the drug's efficiency. The effectiveness was assessed by comparing the dose-response curves of Ami-NPs and non-encapsulated Ami in male and female Wistar rats subjected to the forced swimming test (FST). Ami-NPs were fabricated using nanoprecipitation, with a copolymer of poly (methyl vinyl ether/maleic acid) as the encapsulant, and a 3% solution of poloxamer F-127 as surfactant stabilizer. A Box-Behnken design was used to optimize the production of Ami-NPs, resulting in nanoparticles with the following optimal characteristics: a size of 198.6 ± 38.1 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.005 ± 0.03 nm, a zeta potential of -32 ± 6 mV, and encapsulation efficiency of 79.1 ± 7.4%. Ami-NPs showed higher potency and efficacy in reducing immobility during the FST (ED50 = 7.06 mg/kg, Emax = 41.1%), compared to amitriptyline in solution (Ami-S) (ED50 = 11.89 mg/kg, Emax = 33.2%). The Emax of Ami-NPs occurred at 12 mg/kg, while Ami-S peaked at 15.8 mg/kg. In the open field test, only treatment with Ami-NPs (12 mg/kg) and the empty nanoparticles increased immobility. In the elevated plus-maze, treatment with Ami-NPs (12 mg/kg) significantly reduced closed-arm entries (2.1 ± 0.6), compared to control solution (9.5 ± 1.8), control nanoparticles (8 ± 1.0) and Ami-S (11.5 ± 2). In the marble burying test, Ami-NPs (12 mg/kg) significantly reduced buried marbles (2.4 ± 0.4) compared to control nanoparticles (8.7 ± 1.2). These findings suggest that Ami-NPs could be a promising approach to enhance Ami bioavailability, thereby increasing its potency and antidepressant efficacy, while improving anxiolytic-like effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.