Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019882›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Integrating Botanicals into Oncology Care: Consideration of FDA Regulation of Botanical Products and Botanical Clinical Trials.

Tara A Berman, Eran Ben-Arye, Gunver S Kienle, Viraj Master, Alissa Huston, Channing J Paller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds and Their Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Bioactives in Food-As-Medicine for Special Medical Purposes.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tara A BermanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5165-0570
Eran Ben-AryeIntegrative Oncology Program, The Oncology Service, Lin, Carmel & Zebulun Medical Centers, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-3672
Gunver S KienleInstitute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology at the University of Witten/Herdecke, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9498-5944
Viraj MasterEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-142X
Alissa HustonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine & Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0009-0004-5247-9567
Channing J PallerSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-1858

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALAN KEITH MEEKER · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern cancer pharmacotherapy consists of contributions from natural products, their structural analogues, and chemotherapies. Interest in natural products is being revitalized in oncology. Natural products may be classified as food, dietary supplements, drugs, or cosmetics depending on their intended use. A natural product intended to prevent, diagnose, cure, mitigate, or treat disease would be regulated as a drug. Most natural products are regulated as dietary supplements, intended to affect the structure or function of the body. In 2023, Americans spent around $58 billion on dietary supplements, with a majority intended to prevent or treat cancer. Almost 50% of patients with newly diagnosed cancer report taking dietary supplements after diagnosis. Botanicals, natural products made from plants, plant parts, or plant extracts, are one of the most highly used supplements. The natural product market is zealous to promote their supplements and often claim their products will help in combatting disease. Unlike with FDA-approved drugs, botanical dietary supplements may be marketed without proving they work as claimed and do not require clinical trials. To date, only four botanical drug products have been approved for marketing as prescription drugs in the United States. In this study, we evaluate the current paradigm for dietary supplement marketing and FDA approval and its impact on the treatment of patients with cancer. We underscore the need for rigorous clinical trials for clinicians to access sufficient evidence-based data to advise on the safety and efficacy of these products, alone or in conjunction with active treatment for cancer.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDietary SupplementsNeoplasmsPhytotherapyClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID40019882
PMCPMC12975297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.