Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019878›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation according to socio-economic status, after acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: A qualitative study in the RECOVIDS cohort.

Mathilde Kléber, Nicolas Meunier-Beillard, Isabelle Fournel, Eléa Ksiazek, Marine Jacquier, Fiona Ecarnot, Jean-Philippe Rigaud, Pierre-Louis Declerq, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Marie Labruyère

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mathilde KléberService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Nicolas Meunier-BeillardINSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
Isabelle FournelINSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3061-9715
Eléa KsiazekINSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
Marine JacquierService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Fiona EcarnotSINERGIES, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Jean-Philippe RigaudDepartment of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe, France.
Pierre-Louis DeclerqDepartment of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0027-7555
Jean-Pierre QuenotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2351-682X
Marie LabruyèreService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic may have compounded social disparities in access to healthcare, with possible deleterious consequences on the functional prognosis of patients after a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the previous RECOVIDS study, we reported that despite comparable pulmonary sequelae and similar access to rehabilitation, socio-economically "vulnerable" patients had lower quality of life at 6 months after an ICU stay. We aimed to describe the barriers to, and facilitators of participation in rehabilitation, among patients from the RECOVIDS study, regardless of their socio-economic situation.

methodsQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with adult patients admitted to ICU for PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, and who had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or had received high flow nasal oxygen. In addition, patients had to have been living at home for the month prior to the interview and had to be proficient in French. Eligible patients were randomly selected, aiming to select the same number of socially deprived and non-socially-deprived patients. Interviews were transcribed for thematic analysis.

resultsIn total, 31 interviews were performed from 10/2021 to 01/2022; 16 with socially deprived, and 15 with non-deprived participants. Average age was 65.2 (±11.6) years. Four themes emerged from the analysis of the interviews, namely: (1) the impact of the patient's professional and socio-economic situation; (2) the feeling that age and socio-economic situation influence access to rehabilitation; (3) a perception that the healthcare system was saturated, and that inequalities exist in access to rehabilitation resources; (4) perception of previous own health and expectations of post-resuscitation health status.

conclusionA precarious socio-economic situation has a substantial impact on access to rehabilitation after ICU admission for ARDS caused by COVID-19. It represents a barrier to rehabilitation through the combined action of various social determinants that deserve to be detected early, in order to take appropriate action to ensure that the most socially vulnerable individuals can benefit from access to rehabilitation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Social ClassSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID40019878
PMCPMC11870383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.