Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019742›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Structural Discrimination in Nonprofit Hospital Community Benefit Spending.

Aaron Hedquist, David Blumenthal, Dannie Dai, Jessica Phelan, E John Orav, Jose F Figueroa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Health Funding for Parks and Greenspace: An Innovative Community Investment Strategy.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron HedquistDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
David BlumenthalDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dannie DaiDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jessica PhelanDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
E John OravDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jose F FigueroaDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nonprofit hospitals receive substantial tax exemptions to provide a community benefit. However, little is known about the distribution of community benefit spending (CBS) across US communities with varying degrees of social vulnerability beyond the hospital's immediate geographic area. Objective: To assess associations of CBS per capita with community-level characteristics and social determinants of health. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used Internal Revenue Service Series 990 Tax Forms from 2018 to 2023, to create a dataset of CBS for nonprofit hospitals in the US. Facility-level CBS allocation to counties was based on inpatient utilization to more accurately reflect a hospital's community. Data were analyzed from January to December 2024. Exposures: County-level race and ethnicity characteristics and socioeconomic factors, including educational attainment, proportion living below 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL), and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) score. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was total CBS per capita. Generalized linear regression models with a γ log-link function were used to assess the association of CBS per capita with community-level social determinants of health characteristics. Results: A total of 2465 nonprofit hospitals across 3140 US counties were included. Allocation of CBS varied significantly across communities, with the counties in the highest quintile receiving a mean (SD) of $540 ($250) per capita compared with counties in the lowest quintile with $22 ($16) per capita. Communities in the highest quintile of CBS had a higher proportion of White residents, while communities in the lowest quintile had a higher proportion of residents who were non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, had lower educational attainment, and were living with incomes below 138% of the FPL. For every 1% proportional increase in non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic residents in a community, there was 1.61% (95% CI, 1.38%-1.84%) and 0.88% (95% CI, 0.63%-1.14%) less CBS per capita, respectively. In addition, there was less allocation of CBS per capita among counties with a greater proportion of people with low educational attainment, greater levels of poverty, or higher SVI scores. These results were consistent before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that nonprofit hospitals' CBS was regressively allocated across US communities, with more socially vulnerable or racially and ethnically minoritized communities receiving less benefit than more affluent, non-Hispanic White communities, suggesting that the nonprofit tax system may be structurally discriminatory and contributing to health disparities.

Indexed as

Hospitals, VoluntaryOrganizations, NonprofitSocial Determinants of HealthTax ExemptionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40019742
PMCPMC11871545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.