ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Subxiphoid hernia, definition and repair: an international delphi consensus.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subxiphoid hernias: does surgical approach matter? An analysis of the ACHQC database.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Subxiphoid Incisional Hernia Following Cardiac Procedures: A Narrative Review.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSubxiphoid incisional hernias (SIH) are rare and challenging to repair, often occurring post- cardiac surgery after sternotomy and pericardial drainage. The literature on SIH is limited, with small patient cohorts and no established consensus on optimal repair strategies published yet. This present study aimed at proposing the definition and the surgical management and decision-making processes for SIH repair through an international Delphi consensus among expert surgeons.
methodsUsing a modified Delphi technique, 69 international abdominal wall surgeons were invited. Three rounds were conducted to reach consensus on the definition, characteristics, classification, preoperative imaging and surgical approaches for SIH. Consensus was defined as more than 70% of agreement on 32 statements across 12 topics.
resultsSixty-nine experts were enrolled from 5 continents. Concerning definition of SIH, consensus was reached: a defect where the M1 part represents the most challenging and representative part. According to the expert panel, a mesh should be used in an extraperitoneal position. Both open and minimal invasive surgical (MIS) approach (E-TEP and/or ventral TAPP) are viable for W1 (< 4 cm) SIH repair. Achieving sufficient mesh overlap (> 5 cm) and defect closure are the 2 primary goals during SIH repair, whatever the approach and the technique. Expert panel agreed that a solid understanding of the anatomy is crucial and difficult in this area, due to the proximity of bony structures. For cranial overlap, exposing the central tendon of the diaphragm after cutting the posterior rectus sheath horizontally reached consensus. Concerning lateral overlap, the panel agreed on a retro rectus repair with TAR for ≥W2 hernia, while total preperitoneal repair is not. Mesh fixation is deemed unnecessary if adequate overlap is achieved. In case of difficulties of closure, only TAR might be helpful, with bridging as a last resort. They agreed that SIH ≥W2 should be referred to an expert hernia center.
conclusionThis Delphi consensus defined SIH and was an opportunity to emphasize the anatomy of the subxiphoid region. It opens the way for future strong studies on the subject, leading for recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40019634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.