ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Population pharmacokinetic modeling of asciminib in support of exposure-response and ethnic sensitivity analyses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Exposure-response analysis of asciminib efficacy and safety in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Dual functional genomics reveals a broad and convergent landscape of asciminib resistance in BCR::ABL1.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging Model-Informed Drug Development to Predict Asciminib Efficacy in Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Influence of pharmacokinetics-related polymorphisms on asciminib exposure in patients with Japanese chronic myeloid leukemia.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe original population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model for asciminib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) was refined to address drug development needs in support of drug submission, namely, attainment of target drug exposure in specific patient populations, populating individual daily exposures for exposure-response analyses of key efficacy and safety endpoints, confirmation of comparability in exposure between 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d., and assessment of ethnic insensitivity.
methodsParticipants from two organ dysfunction studies, patients with CML in blast and acute phases and acute lymphoblastic leukemia and patients from a phase III efficacy study in newly diagnosed Ph + CML-CP, and data from a dedicated phase II study in the Chinese patients previously treated with at least two prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and a phase IIIb study comparing two dose regimens of asciminib (40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d.) were included in the revised popPK model. Covariates evaluated were line of therapy, baseline renal and hepatic functions, Chinese or Japanese ethnicity.
resultsThe apparent clearance and steady-state volume of distribution of asciminib were 6.84 L/h and 110 L, respectively, for a typical individual of 70 kg weight and 90 mL/min absolute glomerular filtration rate. Both the 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. resulted in a steady-state daily AUC of 12,600 ng.h/mL, and there was no difference between lines of therapy. Effects of renal or hepatic impairment on clearance were not clinically relevant. Chinese and Japanese exhibited similar PK as that of the global population.
conclusionsThe 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. regimens are comparable in their daily exposure, supporting the use of the two dosing regimens in newly diagnosed and previously treated CML-CP patients. The PK of asciminib is insensitive to ethnic differences and no dose adjustment is required for severe renal and hepatic impaired patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40019625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.