ArticleRheumatology international2025
Screening and diagnosis of sarcopenia in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: findings from a cross-sectional study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- No Differences in Malnutrition Status and Prognostic Nutrition Index Between Female Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case-Control Study.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with an increased risk for orthorexia nervosa: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Knowledge and perceptions of medical practitioners on the role of nutrition in systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2026Article
- Prevalence of malnutrition using the GLIM criteria and the subjective global assessment among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Nutritional Status and Dietary Challenges in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Frequency of dysphagia among patients submitted to a rheumatology department: a cross-sectional analysis based on the EAT-10 questionnaire.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Sarcopenia in Rheumatic Diseases: A Hidden Issue of Concern.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle mass and reduced muscle function, presenting various adverse events, especially when inflammation is present. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and identify the risk for sarcopenia using two screening tools the Strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) and the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA). In this single-center cross-sectional study, 220 consecutive patients visiting the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology at the University General Hospital of Larissa were interviewed. The EWGSOP criteria were used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, while sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, number needed to screen, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were used to validate the diagnostic validity of the SARC-F and the MSRA. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were also applied to model the relationship between sarcopenia and other variables. In the total sample, 15.9% of patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia and one patient with sarcopenic obesity. The SARC-F (sensitivity 22.2%, specificity 75.6%), the 5-item (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 18.9%), and the 7-item MSRA (sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 9.2%) presented poor clinical performance when used for screening alone. Univariate logistic regression analyses showed that underweight status, systemic sclerosis and appetite loss are strong contributors to sarcopenia diagnosis. Sarcopenia is prevalent among RMDs, and screening is essential within RMD clinics. None of the screening tools (SARC-F and MSRA) can stand alone in assessing sarcopenia in patients with RMDs. More research is required to understand sarcopenia in RMDs and validate the wide-using screening tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.