ArticleMycorrhiza2025
Synonymization of three species of Rhizophagus based on morphological and molecular evidence and biogeography of Rhizophagus clarus.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Taxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) historically has been based mostly on analyses of spore morphology. Molecular evidence has been widely used in phylogeny since the turn of the century and has contributed to the nomenclature of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Considering that some species were described solely from field collected spores which often are degraded, synonymy amongst described species is likely. Type and living cultures of Rhizophagus clarus and Rhizophagus manihotis, and protologue of Glomus zaozhuangianus were analyzed to compare spore wall structure. Sequences of the large subunit (LSU) of the rDNA gene of living isolates of Rhizophagus clarus and Rhizophagus manihotis also were used to test phylogenetic relationships. A comprehensive biogeography of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was used to investigate species distribution according to soil and climate factors. Spore wall structure analysis indicates that the three species are morphologically indistinguishable. Spore color, size, and shape all overlap highly among the three species. The spore wall of each is composed of an outer hyaline mucilaginous layer, a rigid hyaline laminated layer conferring a visible "halo" to mature spores, and a third rigid pigmented laminated layer that confers spore color. Phylogenetic analysis shows that living isolates identified as R. manihotis were nested with living isolates of R. clarus, forming a monophyletic clade with 99% bootstrap support. Spores of R. clarus (as amended here) have been recorded in six continents and 31 countries in 10 biogeographical realms. R. clarus was detected most often in soil pH 5.0-6.0, soil P up to 5 mg/dm
Indexed as
Identifiers
40019552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.