Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019317›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025

Pediatric Sepsis Phenotype in a Single-Center Cohort Covering 2010-2020: Evolution in Day 1-Day 3 Trajectory and Potential Prognostic Value.

Zachary Aldewereld, Christopher Horvat, Gilles Clermont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary AldewereldDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4367-9036
Christopher HorvatDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Gilles ClermontDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

Personalized Therapies of Pediatric SepsisK23AI190128 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Zachary Aldewereld · 2025 to 2026
$372k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI190128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the utility of day 3 sepsis phenotype classifications compared with day 1 and whether these could be reliably identified using routine clinical data on day 1.

designRetrospective cohort study of pediatric patients managed 2010-2014 and 2018-2020.

settingAcademic children's hospital. PATIENTS: One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight children (1 mo to 18 yr old) admitted to the PICU with suspected infection who received a minimum of 7 days of systemic antibiotics.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSubjects showed significant evolution of phenotype from day 1 to day 3, with 31.7-60.9% remaining the same type. Outcomes were worst in those classifying as type D on day 3, with mortality as high as 16.6% in those that were classified as type D on both days 1 and 3, as well as 11.3% in those initially classified as type C (a lower mortality type) on day 1 but type D on day 3. Accurate statistical prediction of day 3 types using multinomial logistic regression and random forest and day 1 data was poor, despite attempts to improve performance.

conclusionsIn our retrospective cohort of patients with sepsis, we identified significant evolution in phenotype over the first 3 days of illness. Day 3 phenotypes may provide more accurate statistical prediction of outcomes, but identification of day 3 phenotypes using data available early in the course of illness is challenging. New methods will likely be required to improve performance in this area.

Indexed as

SepsisAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePhenotypePrognosisRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agentsclusteringelectronic health recordpersonalized medicinephenotypesepsis

Identifiers

PMID40019317
PMCPMC12746478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.