ArticleJournal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
Unlocking the Mystery: Resident-Led POCUS Intervention in Community Hospital Revealing Pericardial Tamponade in a Complex Case.
Article in Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myxedema-related cardiac tamponade diagnosed by focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS): a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pericardial effusions, though relatively rare, can lead to life-threatening complications such as cardiac tamponade. While viral etiologies are common culprits, rapid and accurate diagnosis remains challenging. We present the case of a 74-year-old male with a history of upper respiratory infection who developed sudden onset dyspnea and chest discomfort. Bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large pericardial effusion, prompting urgent intervention. Despite initially stable vital signs, the patient rapidly deteriorated, necessitating emergent pericardiocentesis. Laboratory findings and pathology results eventually ruled out common viral causes, guiding diagnosis toward coxsackieviruses A and B, echovirus, adenoviruses, or influenza. This case highlights the critical role of POCUS in resident-led community hospitals, in expediting the diagnosis of pericardial effusions and underscores the need for prompt intervention in cases of cardiac tamponade to prevent adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.