Trial reportJournal of global health2025
Relationship of perinatal outcomes to the competence and quantity of contact with community health workers.
Trial report in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of perinatal home visits by community health workers (CHWs) often diminishes when large regional or national programmes are implemented. To address this gap, we aimed to identify which CHW behaviours influence maternal and child outcomes. Methods: We randomised all government-funded CHWs at eight deeply rural clinics (n = 43) by clinic to usual care, which consisted of home visits (control group; four clinics, 23 CHWs, 392 mothers), or to home visiting, which included improved monitoring and supervision (intervention group; four clinics, 20 CHWs, 423 mothers). Since fewer than 7% of CHWs in the control group ever implemented home visits and no data was available on the frequency of visits, we focussed on the CHWs in the intervention group. We monitored the number and timing of home visits over time and documented it by paper and mobile phone records. Supervisors who conducted at-home observations of visits completed competency ratings on each CHW. We evaluated the associations between the competency of the CHW and the number and timing of CHWs' visits with 13 maternal/child outcomes using multiple regression analyses. Results: Consistent home visits by CHWs reached the threshold at about 9-12 months, with the frequency reducing because of COVID-19. There were two significant outcomes (antiretroviral therapy adherence and securing the child grant) associated with the number of home visits in the intervention group, but insufficient to demonstrate efficacy. The CHW competency was unrelated to any maternal/child outcome. Moreover, CHWs visited 7% of mothers during the first two days of their infants' lives, 26% during the first week, 57% within the first month, and 90% by the first three months of life. Conclusions: Current standards for training and monitoring of paraprofessional home visitors are highly unrealistic. Substantial and ongoing investments are needed for visits to occur consistently over time. However, hiring and selection criteria are likely as important as training and monitoring. CHW programmes must be embedded in organisational contexts that are well functioning and have management and support structures that are operational to ensure their success.Keywords.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.