ArticleMedical education online2025
Trainee perspectives on diversity, equity, and inclusion: a group concept mapping study.
Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Group Concept Mapping in Medical and Public Health Education.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing work highlights the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in graduate medical education. Few studies have employed participatory research approaches to solicit trainee perspectives related to DEI. Our goal was to utilize group concept mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods participatory research approach, to describe resident perspectives on DEI within a large pediatric residency program. To organize and represent their perspectives on DEI, trainees completed brainstorming, sorting/rating, and interpretation activities in accordance with GCM methodology. Activities occurred via two synchronous discussion sessions (brainstorming and interpretation) and an electronic survey (sorting/rating). Items from the brainstorming session were sorted (i.e. grouped into categories by similarity) and rated (i.e. ranked on perceived importance and likelihood to change) by participants individually. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering were used to generate point maps, cluster maps, and go-zone illustrations for use in the interpretation session. We present data regarding participant characteristics and engagement, results from GCM activities, and action steps from this process. There were a total of 127 trainees in the residency program in 2021-2022. Participation varied across activities (brainstorming session: 21 participants; sorting/rating: 48 participants; interpretation session: 20 participants). A total of 64 unique items were generated from brainstorming. Five clusters emerged: 1) city factors, 2) institutional factors, 3) program representation, 4) program components, 5) non-DEI program perks. Program representation and program components clusters were rated as the most important and the most likely to be changed. Participants identified several action steps during the interpretation session which were shared with institutional leadership to direct programmatic reform. We demonstrate the utility of GCM, a structured and scalable participatory research method, to characterize trainee perceptions of DEI in graduate medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.