ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2025
Optimizing electrical field stimulation parameters reveals the maximum contractile function of human skeletal muscle microtissues.
Article in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complement-independent pathogenic influences of anti-HMGCR + and anti-SRP + immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy autoantibodies on engineered muscle function.Skeletal muscle · 2025Article
- Myo-MOVES: a custom electrical stimulation system for functional studies of 3D bioengineered muscle.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle microtissues are engineered to develop therapies for restoring muscle function in patients. However, optimal electrical field stimulation (EFS) parameters to evaluate the function of muscle microtissues remain unestablished. This study reports a protocol to optimize EFS parameters for eliciting contractile force of muscle microtissues cultured in micropost platforms. Muscle microtissues were produced across an opposing pair of microposts in polydimethylsiloxane and polymethyl methacrylate culture platforms using primary, immortalized, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived myoblasts. In response to EFS between needle electrodes, contraction deflects microposts proportional to developed force. At 5 V, pulse durations used for native muscle (0.1-1 ms) failed to elicit contraction of microtissues; durations reported for engineered muscle (5-10 ms) failed to elicit peak force. Instead, pulse durations of 20-80 ms were required to elicit peak twitch force across microtissues derived from five myoblast lines. Similarly, although peak tetanic force occurs at 20-50 Hz for native human muscles, it varied across microtissues depending on the cell line type, ranging from 7 to 60 Hz. A new parameter, the dynamic oscillation of force, captured trends during rhythmic contractions, whereas quantifying the duration-at-peak force provides an extended kinetics parameter. Our findings indicate that muscle microtissues have cell line type-specific contractile properties, yet all contract and relax more slowly than native muscle, implicating underdeveloped excitation-contraction coupling. Failure to optimize EFS parameters can mask the functional potential of muscle microtissues by underestimating force production. Optimizing and reporting EFS parameters and metrics is necessary to leverage muscle microtissues for advancing skeletal muscle therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.