ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
Changing Epidemiology of Pediatric Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap in Eastern European Cystic Fibrosis Care: How Newborn Screening and Advanced CFTR Modulation Shape the Clinical Landscape in Western Romania.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Epidemiology ofNew microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: A 24-Month Italian National Registry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Airway Microbiome in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of Microbial Shifts and Therapeutic Impacts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Viral Infection Correlates with a Better Clinical Outcome than Pulmonary Exacerbation of Bacterial Origin in Paediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe introduction of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), a highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy, to younger ages and the COVID-19 pandemic have significantly reduced pulmonary exacerbations requiring hospitalization among children with CF.
objectiveTo assess demographic and clinical characteristics of children and young adults with CF hospitalized for pulmonary exacerbations before and after pediatric ETI approval.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted at five United States CF Foundation-accredited care centers. Hospitalization data from children and young adults with CF in 2018 and 2022 were analyzed.
resultsHospitalizations decreased from 471 cases (241 individuals) in 2018 to 163 cases (110 individuals) in 2022. The racial distribution shifted, with more hospitalized patients identifying as people of color in 2022 (28% vs. 14%; p = 0.018). A greater proportion of hospitalized children in 2022 had two non-F508del mutations compared with children hospitalized in 2018 (38% vs. 19%) and were less likely to be infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Comparing 2022-2018, children on CFTR modulator therapy, including ETI (76%), showed reduced infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter xylosoxidans.
conclusionsThe decline in hospitalizations for pulmonary exacerbations likely reflects the benefits of ETI therapy, as a higher proportion of children and young adults hospitalized in 2022 had two non-F508del mutations and were not eligible for ETI. A greater percentage of those hospitalized in 2022 identified as belonging to minority racial groups, highlighting ongoing health disparities in the ETI era. Additionally, there were notable changes in the microbiological characteristics between 2018 and 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.