ArticleJournal of water and health2025
Drinking private well water: Groundwater quality and management of wells in southern Alabama.
Article in Journal of water and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Private wells provide a source of household water for over 40 million people in the United States and an estimated 1 million people in the Coastal Lowlands Aquifer system along the Gulf of Mexico. Well water quality is dependent on the local geology and factors that contribute to anthropogenic contamination from the surface. Here, we evaluated groundwater quality and well management in southern Alabama, USA, to better understand factors that influence exposures through drinking water from private wells. The most common constituents that exceeded USEPA primary or secondary human health benchmarks were pH (92%), and total coliform (TC) (25%), followed by Fe (7%), Pb (6%), nitrate (1%), and As (1%). Most wells (68%) also displayed temporal changes in the number of exceedances, often showing positive for TC during one sampling campaign and negative in another, while the secondary standard for pH (6.5-8.5) was consistently not met. We also found that the common choices of water treatment did not protect against the most common water quality exceedances. Our results underscore the need to understand well water quality coupled with management practices when assessing potential exposures to the private well population through drinking water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40018966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.