ArticleCancer medicine2025
National Survey of Real-World Australian Treatment Patterns for Patients With Very-Early-To Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National survey of real-world treatment patterns for early- and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma reveals wide variation across Australian states.Internal medicine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background/purpose of the studyThe treatment landscape for very early to intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rapidly evolving, with new data and treatments emerging in recent years. There is a lack of data on current patterns of management for very early to intermediate stage HCC in Australian clinical practice and the role of newly emerging treatment options.
methodsMultidisciplinary specialists involved in HCC management (N = 86) participated in one of six state-based meetings across Australia. Specialists were surveyed on their preferred management approaches at key clinical decision points for four patient case studies ranging from very early to intermediate stage HCC.
resultsPreferred management strategies for each of the patient case studies were largely consistent with current Australian HCC recommendations in relation to surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC although the preferred initial treatment selection varied considerably within and between hepatologists and other craft groups. There was, however, growing interest in emerging treatments, including stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for early stage HCC and systemic treatments used as adjuvant therapy or in combination with locoregional therapy in early and intermediate-stage HCC. However, many participants required more data on these treatment modalities before incorporating them into routine clinical practice.
conclusionThe heterogeneity of (very) early to intermediate-stage HCC patients and the increasing number of available treatment options means clinical decision-making, including treatment selection, is becoming more complex and diverse. More data are required to define the role of SABR and systemic therapies in very early to intermediate stage HCC before being adopted as standard of care in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.