Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018805›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025

Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.

Zsolt Nagykaldi, Mark Doescher, Dorothy A Rhoades, Kathleen Dwyer, Ann Chou, Michele Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zsolt NagykaldiDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-6164
Mark DoescherDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-0428
Dorothy A RhoadesDepartment of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0002-4031-3576
Kathleen DwyerDepartment of Population Health and Health Systems Science, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of Nursing, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-0499
Ann ChouDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-8616
Michele GibsonThe Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Health Services Authority, Talihina, Oklahoma.ORCID 0009-0006-1761-9442

Funding

Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening (TEALS)R01CA225439 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI NAGYKALDI, ZSOLT J · 2019 to 2024
$2.3M
National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA225439NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Cancer Screening study aimed to codesign and test a community-based lung cancer screening (LCS) program within a large, tribally operated health system. In 2020 to 2021, we conducted a pre-post quasi-experimental pilot implementation study of a tailored and comprehensive LCS program in two Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma primary care clinics in rural Oklahoma. The program included screening quality assessment, academic detailing, practice facilitation, health system enhancements, technology support, centralized LCS coordination, and community outreach. Eligibility for LCS was based on the 2013 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention surveys on their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding LCS. All participant charts were extracted to determine LCS completion. Postimplementation semi-structured interviews of patients and clinicians were conducted, and practice facilitator notes were analyzed. Participants (N = 57) averaged 67 years, and 66% were current smokers. The proportion of participants who were up-to-date with LCS increased from 39% to 58% (P < 0.01). About 18% of patients reported improvement in general care choice and treatment discussions with their doctor, and about 40% reported an improvement in their awareness or understanding of lung cancer and receipt of LCS. We also identified several key facilitators and barriers to LCS implementation at the practice and health system levels. LCS acceptance and uptake improved significantly in this community-engaged pilot intervention which informed a subsequent cluster-randomized trial. Comprehensive and community-engaged LCS programs may have the potential to improve the delivery of LCS in underserved community settings. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Our community-engaged, multicomponent, and multilevel pilot implementation study significantly improved lung cancer screening rates in a rural, tribal health system. A key feature of this pilot study was a centralized screening coordination service supported by a population screening registry. We believe that our study is replicable in other settings. See related Spotlight, p. 381.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOklahomaPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareRural Population

Identifiers

PMID40018805
PMCPMC12209819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.