ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025
Deep learning for named entity recognition in Turkish radiology reports.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary objective of this research is to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of information extraction from radiology reports. In addressing this objective, the study aims to develop and evaluate a deep learning framework for named entity recognition (NER).
methodsWe used a synthetic dataset of 1,056 Turkish radiology reports created and labeled by the radiologists in our research team. Due to privacy concerns, actual patient data could not be used; however, the synthetic reports closely mimic genuine reports in structure and content. We employed the four-stage DYGIE++ model for the experiments. First, we performed token encoding using four bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models: BERTurk, BioBERTurk, PubMedBERT, and XLM-RoBERTa. Second, we introduced adaptive span enumeration, considering the word count of a sentence in Turkish. Third, we adopted span graph propagation to generate a multidirectional graph crucial for coreference resolution. Finally, we used a two-layered feed-forward neural network to classify the named entity.
resultsThe experiments conducted on the labeled dataset showcase the approach's effectiveness. The study achieved an F1 score of 80.1 for the NER task, with the BioBERTurk model, which is pre-trained on Turkish Wikipedia, radiology reports, and biomedical texts, proving to be the most effective of the four BERT models used in the experiment.
conclusionWe show how different dataset labels affect the model's performance. The results demonstrate the model's ability to handle the intricacies of Turkish radiology reports, providing a detailed analysis of precision, recall, and F1 scores for each label. Additionally, this study compares its findings with related research in other languages. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our approach provides clinicians with more precise and comprehensive insights to improve patient care by extracting relevant information from radiology reports. This innovation in information extraction streamlines the diagnostic process and helps expedite patient treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.