Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018713›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Influence of surface texture on osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells: An

Komal Rajpurohit, Vidya Dodwad, Avinash Kharat, Spoorthi Belludi, Pooja Pharne, Sarah Marium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Komal RajpurohitDepartment of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental college and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vidya DodwadDepartment of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental college and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Avinash KharatRegenerative Medicine Laboratory, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Spoorthi BelludiDepartment of Periodontology, K.L.E Society of Dental Sciences, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pooja PharneDepartment of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental college and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sarah MariumDepartment of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental college and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In comparison with perfectly machined surface implants, surface topographic modifications like roughness accelerate the osteogenesis of dental pulpal stem cells (DPSC). This greatly enhances bone-implant contact and osteogenic potential of the stem cells. Hence, the aim of the current study was to evaluate and compare the differentiation and proliferation potential of stem cells obtained from dental pulp on sand-blasted and acid etched implant discs surfaces. Materials and Methods: Stem cells from dental pulp were extracted from the premolar region of oral cavity. Titanium discs that measured one centimeter in diameter and three millimetres in thickness were used as investigation surfaces. Titanium surface disc were acid etched and sandblasted. Investigation had three group: acid etched (Group A), sandblasted (Group B), and standard control group, i.e., cells treated with osteogenic induction media only (Group C). In Group C, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were treated with osteogenic induction medium without any titanium disc and these cells were used as standard controls. To identify which modified implant surface had greater potential for proliferation, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed using the explant culture. MTT assay assessed the viability of the cells as a function of its redox potential. This was followed by recognition of the stem cells for CD90, CD73, and CD 105 markers using flow cytometry with RUNX2 antibody on days 7 and 21 of incubation. The isolated cells were stained using 1% alizarin red stain to identify the number of stem cells per square centimeter area under the light microscope. Results: The osteogenic differentiation of both the materials was compared with standard control (MSCs treated with osteogenic differentiation media only). The osteoblastic cells on the acid-etched and sand-blasted implant surface disc had an almost identical capacity for proliferation till the MTT assay but according to the results of the alizarin red staining there was a slightly higher proliferation potential on acid etched surfaces compared to the sand blasted surfaces. Therefore, acid etched surfaces showed higher potential of osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs compared with sand-blasted surfaces. Conclusion: In comparison with perfectly machined surface implants, topographic surface modifications such as roughness can accelerate the osteogenesis of DPSC

Indexed as

Acid etched implant discbone regenerationimplant surfacesosseointegrationsand-blasted implant discstem cells

Identifiers

PMID40018713
PMCPMC11864341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.