ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Applying nanopore sequencing in the etiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxford Nanopore Sequencing, a Promising Technology for Precision Diagnostics in Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Rapid identification of microbial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance from bloodstream infections using long-read sequencing.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- G-Quadruplex Unwinding Molecular Mechanisms by Helicases and Their Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Current status and prospects of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a systemic infectious disease that can lead to shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiorgan failure, and even death. Blood culture is considered the gold standard for the etiological diagnosis of BSI; however, blood culture is time-consuming and has a low positivity rate, which has limited its utility for early and rapid clinical diagnosis. Nanopore sequencing technology (NST), a third-generation sequencing method, offers rapid detection, real-time single-molecule sequencing, and ultra-long reads. These features enable the prompt detection of pathogens and the analysis of drug-resistant genes and genomic characteristics, thereby optimizing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of BSI. In this article, we summarize the application of NST in the etiological diagnosis of BSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.