ArticleBMJ public health2024
Determinants of treatment-seeking behaviour and healthcare provider choice in Afghanistan in 2018: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: In Afghanistan, remarkable achievements have been made in improving access to healthcare and health outcomes since the introduction of essential healthcare packages. Nonetheless, sociodemographic and geographical inequities persist, and out-of-pocket expenditures are high. This study investigates the client and provider determinants of access to care that affect treatment-seeking behaviour in 2018. Methods: Secondary data analysis using data on treatment-seeking behaviour in public and private healthcare from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 was combined with data on the quality of public healthcare facilities from a national healthcare facility assessment of the same year. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore associations between client characteristics and accessibility of public healthcare facilities, and treatment-seeking behaviour and choice of public versus private healthcare provider. Results: The results suggest that the odds of seeking treatment are lowest among the rural poor. The odds of treatment-seeking and choosing a public healthcare provider are higher for pregnancy-related health needs but lower for chronic conditions. Affordability of healthcare was associated with lower odds of treatment-seeking (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and using private healthcare providers (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99). Increased satisfaction with opening hours (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) and availability of a female nurse or doctor (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04) in public health facilities, and a higher level of trust in healthcare provider (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06) were associated with higher odds of using public healthcare. Conclusion: Afghanistan's public healthcare system is vital in providing care to the economically disadvantaged and managing infectious diseases and maternal health problems. The private sector plays a dominant role, particularly for those illnesses not covered under the essential healthcare packages. The study suggests opportunities for the public healthcare system to alleviate financial barriers to healthcare access and broaden its service offerings to encompass the management of chronic illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.