ArticleBMJ public health2024
Prevalence of risky sexual behaviour and its associated factors among youths of Pokhara metropolitan city, Nepal: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Risky sexual behaviour, which puts young people at greater risk of acquiring HIV AIDS and sexually transmitted infection, is a significant public health concern all around the world. In 2020, 15% of ever reported HIV positive cases were youths in Nepal. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of risky sexual behaviour and its associated factors among youths of Pokhara metropolitan city. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done. The study population was youths aged 15-24 who were currently studying in grades 11/12 or at the bachelor level. The sample size was 850, interviewed in two strata (male and female). A multistage cluster sampling technique was used. A self-administered, structured questionnaire was used to obtain information. Bivariate (χ Results: Overall, nearly a third (31%) respondents ever had sexual intercourse. Similarly, the overall prevalence of risky sexual behaviour was 18.6% (95% CI=16% to 21.2%), while the prevalence among sexually active respondents was 60% (95% CI=53.7% to 65.5%). The prevalence varied greatly among two sexes where 72% male and 31% female were involved in risky sexual behaviour. The logistic regression analysis showed that females were 72% (AOR=0.28, 95% CI=0.12 to 0.69) less likely than males and youths aged 20-24 were 72% (AOR=0.28, 95% CI=0.13 to 0.57) less likely than adolescents aged 15-19 to engage in risky sexual behaviour. Similarly, in regard to caste, Janajatis were almost six times (AOR=5.56, 95% CI=2.47 to 12.5) and Dalits/Madhesi/others were almost two times more likely to involve in risky sexual behaviour than Brahmin/Chhetri. Conclusion: This study shows a significantly higher prevalence of risky sexual behaviour among adolescents, males and Janajatis than their counterparts. Hence, youths should be educated and empowered to practice safe sexual behaviour through appropriate educational and behaviour change interventions with a special focus on adolescents, males and Janajatis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.