Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018615›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

Determinants of access to primary healthcare for formerly incarcerated women transitioning into the community: a systematic review of the literature.

Nisreen Agbaria, Margit Wirth, Volker Winkler, Babak Moazen, Marie Claire Van Hout, Heino Stöver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing participation in digital health studies: understanding appointment attendance.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Exploring Medication Safety in Transitions From Prison to Community: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nisreen AgbariaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6297-6349
Margit WirthSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-6367-4692
Volker WinklerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9974-1145
Babak MoazenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2552-0438
Marie Claire Van HoutPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-4060
Heino StöverInstitute of Addiction Research (ISFF), Frankfurt University of Applied Science Faculty of Health and Social Work, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women with a history of incarceration experience significantly poorer health outcomes and encounter barriers to accessing healthcare, both during incarceration and after release. These challenges are more pronounced compared with both their male counterparts and women in the general population. We conducted a systematic literature review to respond to the following research questions: (1) what are the determinants of primary healthcare uptake and retention among formerly incarcerated women transitioning into the community? and (2) what are the barriers and facilitators for their access to primary healthcare postrelease? Methods: Following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and drawing on Levesques' Patient-Centered Access to Healthcare Model, we searched and identified relevant publications from 2012 onwards in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science databases and Google Scholar. Records were included if they reported primary healthcare among formerly incarcerated women. Findings from the included studies were extracted and arranged under relevant themes using convergent-integrated approach. Findings: A total of 3524 records were identified and reviewed, from which 37 publications were included in the review. Five main themes emerged as follows: (1) trends and predisposing factors, (2) barriers and facilitators to care, (3) continuity of care and arrangement between the prison and community health providers, (4) prescriptions and health insurance enrolment and (5) interventions to improve primary healthcare utilisation postrelease. Additional sub-themes, such as perceived discrimination in the healthcare system and delays in cancer screening, were identified and discussed. Conclusion: The findings of the systematic review underscore the ongoing challenges women face in accessing primary care when transitioning from incarceration to the community. Enhancing coordination efforts between prison services and community healthcare providers requires a comprehensive assessment of women's healthcare needs during this transition, alongside evaluating the availability of transitional programmes. Further research is required to explore the long-term impact of such programmes and to address the gaps in evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Community HealthPreventive MedicinePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40018615
PMCPMC11816345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.