ArticleBMJ public health2024
Equity in home care use in Canada: a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian longitudinal study on ageing.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographic variation and factors associated with home-based long-term care utilization across municipalities in Japan.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Characteristics of long stay home care clients' acute care use who live with frailty in Alberta, Canada: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Paying for home care: a cross-sectional study of participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although home care is an essential service that enables older adults to age at home, there are concerns that not all populations have equitable access to home care services in Canada. The primary objective of this study is to describe formal home care use in Canada across a broad set of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of formal home care use among community-dwelling adults aged 45+ using data from the Canadian longitudinal study on ageing (CLSA) at the 3-year post-baseline follow-up (2015-18). We calculated crude prevalences of formal home care use, stratified by functional status, within the following equity stratification factors: sex, gender, income, education, immigration history, rurality, social support and population group. We used logistic regression models with marginal effects to calculate prevalences of formal home care use while further adjusting for factors related to home care need such as functional impairment, chronic conditions, assistive device use and self-reported health. Results: Of 43 115 CLSA participants included, we found that 8.0% used formal home care services in the previous 12 months. Higher levels of functional impairment were consistently associated with greater home care use. Our unadjusted analysis found significant variations in home care use by sex, gender, income, education, immigration history, rurality and social support. After adjusting for factors related to home care need, we found that individuals with lower income, recent immigration and lower education were significantly less likely to use formal home care services, while individuals with less social support were significantly more likely to use formal home care services. Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in home care use in Canada by income, immigration, education and social support. These findings emphasise the importance of developing federal and provincial policies to address barriers and promote equitable access to home care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.