ArticleBMJ public health2024
Does socioeconomic status modify how individuals perceive or describe their own health? An assessment of reporting heterogeneity in the Health Survey for England.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urban environment, health, and equity: A population-based study of symptoms and annoyances related to air pollution, traffic noise, and greenness.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Intersectional Stigma and Health of People Living with HIV on ART Who Use Alcohol in Southwestern Uganda.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-reported health (SRH) is widely used as a proxy for health status; it is a simple, holistic measure of health and has been associated with other health outcomes. However, variation in these associations has been found by subgroup, leaving open the possibility of systematic reporting differences, including by socioeconomic status. Methods: Using data from the 2017 and 2018 waves of the Health Survey for England, we assessed the relationship between deprivation quintile and SRH using multiple linear regression models for EQ-5D score, a health-related quality of life measure. Reporting heterogeneity between deprivation quintiles was assessed by the significance of model interaction terms. Analyses were stratified by sex and accounted for age group, ethnicity, marital status and religion (females only). Results: Significant interactions were found between deprivation quintile and SRH in the models for EQ-5D score for participants reporting poor health in the two most deprived quintiles, with coefficients ranging from -0.041 to -0.098. The largest differences were in the second most deprived quintile for men (-0.075, 95% CI: -0.110 to -0.040, p<0.001) and the most deprived quintile for women (-0.098, 95% CI: -0.128 to -0.067, p<0.001). Secondary analyses using body mass index as the response variable, for models structured in a similar way to those for EQ-5D, found no significant interaction terms between deprivation quintile and SRH. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that people from more deprived areas who report themselves to be in poor health may have worse health, as measured by EQ-5D, than those from less deprived areas. This could lead to an underestimation of health inequalities, including in measures, such as healthy life expectancy in England, that incorporate SRH data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.