ArticleBMJ public health2024
Contribution of deaths of despair to the Hispanic mortality advantage in the USA by person, place and time: an ecological analysis of vital registration data.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: In the USA, Hispanics exhibit longer life expectancy (LE) compared to non-Hispanic whites despite facing greater socioeconomic adversity and greater health risk factors, a phenomenon known as the Hispanic paradox. With recent increases in mortality due to 'deaths of despair' among non-Hispanic whites and other groups it is important to understand the contribution of deaths of despair to the Hispanic mortality advantage overall and how it varies by age and geography. Methods: Using national mortality data across three decades (1990-2019) we calculated LE at birth for Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites, overall and by place (established Hispanic destinations before 1990, and new Hispanic destinations by 2000, 2010 and 2020). We used the Arriaga method to decompose the contribution of deaths of despair to the Hispanic mortality advantage by age, time and place. Results: The Hispanic mortality advantage has progressively increased over time for both females and males. For females 15-39 years of age, the contribution of deaths of despair to a Hispanic mortality advantage rose from 0.02 years in 1990-1994 to 0.25 years in 2015-2019. For males, the contribution changed from 0.02 years to 0.50 years in the same period. The contribution of deaths of despair to the Hispanic mortality advantage appears smaller in established destinations, potentially plateauing for younger individuals, while presenting a marginal Hispanic disadvantage among older individuals in these areas. Conclusion: Despite persistent socioeconomic disadvantages, US Hispanics have continuously held higher LE compared to non-Hispanic whites since 1990. Among other causes, this advantage reflects the sustained increase of deaths of despair in contributing to the Hispanic mortality advantage, but its significance varies across geography with lower contributions in established Hispanic destinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.