ArticleBMJ public health2024
Communicating COVID-19 vaccine information to Chinese communities in the UK: a qualitative study of their knowledge, information sources and trust.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In late 2020, the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates of Chinese people living in the UK were estimated between 52% and 57%, significantly lower than that of the general population (76%). This disparity formed a primary motivation for this study which explored Chinese communities' overall understanding of and attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccines, the sources of information about the vaccines and levels of (dis)trust in these sources. Methods: 29 focus groups with 154 participants from UK-based Chinese communities of varied sociodemographic backgrounds were conducted between March and November 2021. Focus group data were coded with NVivo and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Participants generally had a good understanding of the health benefits of the vaccines, however, many still had concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy. They accessed COVID-19 vaccine information from a multitude of sources and had diverse information needs which to a large extent shaped their knowledge of and attitude towards the vaccines. Participants generally had good digital access and some have developed good digital literacy enabling discernment of mis/disinformation. The ways in which they accessed and engaged with various types of information sources were differentiated by diversities in country/regions of origin, years of residence and main language/dialects spoken. They also demonstrated varying degrees of trust about the communication around vaccines depending on the perceived expertise of the authority, their character and the perceived accuracy and transparency of the information. Conclusion: The UK government and health authorities need to understand Chinese communities' diverse information needs and cultural practices to form culturally and linguistically appropriate COVID-19 vaccine communication strategies to develop trust, targeting not the entire community but subgroups within the community via credible media sources and community networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.