ArticleBMJ public health2024
Contribution of county-level socioeconomic indicators to racial or ethnic differences in neonatal anthropometry in the USA: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Racial and ethnic differences in fetal growth and birth size in the USA have not been adequately explained by individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) factors. We explored whether differences may be partially explained by county-level indicators of SES. Methods: We linked participant zip codes from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies (2009-2013; n=1614) to county-level US census data to calculate a neighbourhood deprivation index, education isolation index and two indices of segregation: racial isolation and evenness. Using causal mediation methods, we evaluated the extent to which racial/ethnic differences in neonatal anthropometrics could be eliminated in a hypothetical setting where everyone lived in counties with high resource availability and racial/ethnic integration. Results: Setting racial evenness to levels consistent with the highest diversity eliminated 79.9% of the difference in birth weight between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black and all the difference (106.3%) in birth weight between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White individuals. Setting racial evenness, racial isolation and education isolation to levels consistent with higher diversity and education was also associated with similar reductions in differences for other anthropometric measures. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in a hypothetical scenario where everyone lived in counties with low deprivation or segregation, race/ethnic differences in neonatal anthropometry may substantially decrease or be eliminated. Our results also highlight the importance of considering community-level and structural factors in analyses of race/ethnic health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.